A candid conversation proves productive

 

“At no time does the caseworker say, ‘Tell me about the guy you’re pregnant by,’ other than to ask whether he’s paying child support.”

The witness testifying next to me was Joe Jones, founder of the Center for Urban Families.

I was in the audience at Johns Hopkins in the fall of 2011 when Joe spoke about the importance of getting the absent father involved with his child and the mother.

Last year, I introduced a bill to create a pilot program that would provide the tools for both parents to achieve success in the home, the workplace, and society at large.

Participants in at least three counties would be required to develop a written family-focused career plan, learn skills that are necessary in the job market, and attend focus groups about employment and financial literacy, economic stability, and building healthy relationships.

That legislation was not enacted.  However, I worked with the Appropriations Committee to include language in the budget requesting the Department of Human Resources to seek a federal grant for a pilot program.

The department’s efforts were less than vigorous.  I communicated that belief to a DHR official several weeks ago.

Our conversation was productive.

Joe Jones emailed me this morning that he and the Secretary  have agreed to establish a workgroup that would review the model in our legislation, updating and refining program outcomes and goals.  This afternoon, the Department submitted testimony supporting the bill with amendments.

I think House Bill 333 will get a favorable report from the Appropriations Committee.

 

 

 

http://www.delsandy.com/wp-admin/

A list and a question

            I start my workday with a list and a question.

            My bills are on a spreadsheet, from the first one that had a public hearing to the one scheduled for March 21.

            As I work my way through the list, I ask this question: What do I need to do today to help pass my bills?    

            My legislation protecting both sides in the signature-collecting process for a referendum was heard three weeks ago.  Yesterday, the Attorney General responded to my request asking how the relevant words in House Bill 312 (fraud, duress, force, etc.) have been defined by the courts.  This morning, I forwarded that legal advice to relevant legislators and staffers.

            House Bill 957 would create a pilot program to encourage a father to be involved when a mother applies for welfare benefits.  The objective: the father would play a positive role in raising the child. 

            I decided to introduce this bill after hearing Joe Jones, who has been nationally recognized for his work in this area, discuss this concept at Johns Hopkins.  I emailed him today to confirm that he would testify at the hearing on March 8.

—  

            Some things are better done offline. 

            Hoping to reach a compromise, the lobbyist for the University System of Maryland proposed a friendly amendment to my bill broadening the exemption from the Public Information Act for the academic work done by professors at state colleges and universities. 

            This afternoon, we received different language from the lobbyist for the state’s newspapers.

             Instead of figuring out our response in a flurry of emails, we’re meeting in my office.

  • My Key Issues:

  • Pimlico and The Preakness
  • Our Neighborhoods
  • Pre-Kindergarten
  • Lead Paint Poisoning