Good Quotes Across Party Lines

28 times.

That’s how often Governor Moore used the word “partnership” in his State of the State address today.

From what you’re written me over the years, I know how much you appreciate partnership across party lines.

The Governor spoke about partnership with the General Assembly – both Democrats and Republicans.

“Partnership isn’t partisan,” he declared.

The Governor also spoke about issues that are of particular interest to me.

“We will protect Marylanders where they live, work, worship, and go to school,” he declared.

“We need to keep investing in lead abatement for children and families, “ he also said.

I’ll use those quotes when I testify on my bills opposing all forms of violent extremism and preventing lead poisoning.

Domestic Terrorism

This is how I began my testimony on House Bill 1075, which would establish an Office of Domestic Terrorism Response in the Department of Emergency Management.

 

We have seen the carnage violent extremism leaves on minority communities.

Just last month, the FBI intervened to thwart a plot by two neo-Nazis to target several BGE electric substations with gunfire in Baltimore County.  Earlier this month, Jewish communities across the country encountered online threats for a “Day of Hate” from far-right groups, forcing extra police patrols, extra security, and extra vigilance at synagogues and in heavily Jewish neighborhoods.

In other states, we have seen murders against the LGBTQ community in Colorado Springs resulting in 5 people killed and 25 wounded, and the racism-inspired shooting in a grocery store in Buffalo resulting in 10 people killed and 3 wounded.

Let us not forget the 2017 murder of Richard Collins, a Bowie State ROTC Candidate, who was murdered by an “alt-right” extremist. We must take the initiative against extremist behavior so that we keep Maryland families and communities safe.

We can and must do so consistent with the First Amendment.

 

This legislation received a favorable committee report and was debated on the House floor yesterday.

These are the unedited remarks of one of my Republican colleagues.

 

A few comments, Madam Speaker:

When this bill popped up, I was just happy that we found an organization of a police department we wanted to fund.

You know, crime is on the rise, and this body has something to do with that, right?  You look at bills like justice reinvestment, juvenile justice reform, no cash bail bond, police reform – it’s all made our citizens significantly less safe.

And when I see this bill come up here, it probably was a good idea – about 22 years ago.

Right now I just feel that it’s ripe for abuse.

When you look at this, it doesn’t really set up a law enforcement.  If you read the bill, it deals with teaching and communicating with higher ed and reporting back to the General Assembly.

What I’m really afraid of is that this is going to end up turning into another political witch hunt.

About ten years ago we saw the political witch hunts first come about, when you had President Barrack Obama weaponize the IRS against Republicans.

It was about 5 years ago, the Democratic Caucus here in Annapolis, had its guy, Congressman Adam Schiff, kind of an unscrupulous congressman, that perpetrated the lies of Russian collusion, for two years now, and lied to the nation.

It was less than a year ago that President Joe Biden, on a nationally-televised stage, lit up Freedom Hall in Pennsylvania, lit it up bright red, and said you know what, Republicans, compared them to Nazis.  And then turned around and said well anyone that believes in this America First agenda – which is about half the voting population by the last election in 2020 – well they’re domestic terrorists, they’re a threat to freedom.

And look, one of the most scary things is that we’ve spending the last two to three weeks talking about bills dealing with parenting and taking rights away from parents.

It was only a year ago that the attorney general of the nation came out, because of the teacher’s union, Merrick Garland, compared people that were protesting at school board meetings, compared them to domestic terrorists.

For all those reasons, just for the chance of being misused, I’m going red on this bill and I urge other people to do the same.

 

House Bill 1075 passed the House of Delegates, 101-35.

Action on the House Floor and Elsewhere

There’s language I’m trying to add to the budget bill.

There’s language in the budget bill I’m trying to revise or delete.

I was told that my legislation on domestic terrorism would be reported to the House floor.

Then I ran into the floor leader for the bill.

He asked me for my thoughts on two issues he expected to be asked about during the floor debate tomorrow.

My Election Reform Act of 2023 passed  House,

The bill moves next year’s primary election date to avoid a conflict with Passover and Ramadan.

It also requires better notice to a community about a proposed change in its polling place.

Tomorrow, I’ll be defending my bill protecting the privacy of women who receive reproductive health care and the people who provide that care, when it’s debated on the House floor.

Preserving Our Democracy

Our democracy is being tested.

What was routine is now in question.

Will the winner of a fair election assume the office?

For the last two sessions, my response to January 7 was legislation criminalizing domestic terrorism.

But even my liberal friends had problems with the term.

Would a misguided prosecutor indict people for engagining in civil disobedience?

A few weeks ago, I learned that Maryland law already makes it a crime for a person “by threat, force, or corrupt means, [to] obstruct, impede, or try to obstruct or impede the administration of justice in a court of the State.”

My bill would extend that prohibition to the other two branches of government, the executive and the legislative.

The legislation would make no change to what action constitues the crime nor the penalty for a violation.

I’m not reinventing the wheel.

I’m trying to preserve our democracy.

 

“It’s got no place in our democracy.”  

“Domestic terrorism is a major threat to our personal safety and to the wellbeing of our democracy.”

That’s how I began the oral testimony on my bill to create a task force on preventing and countering domestic terrorism.

“That attack, that siege, was criminal behavior, plain and simple, and it was behavior that we, the F.B.I., view as domestic terrorism. “It’s got no place in our democracy,” declared Christopher Wray, Director of the FBI, testifying before the Congress.

My written testimony began with that quote.

“Would your bill apply to Antifa?” asked a Republican member of the Judiciary Committee.

“If the definition of domestic terrorism that the task force proposed and the legislature adopted applied to the criminal acts of that group or any other group, it would,” I responded.

A member of the public spoke against the bill, concerned that it would be used unlawfully against liberal groups.

“We would need to enact guard rails on police conduct to prevent that,” I replied.

Last year, I introduced House Bill, 1164, Criminal Law – Domestic Terrorism.

It did not pass.

I suggested to Delegate Clippinger, chair of  the committee, that he write to the director of the Governor’s Office of Homeland Security, asking him to report on the state’s “efforts and plans to prevent, detect, and address domestic terrorism.”

That letter was sent on May 11, 2020.  It has yet to be answered.

Threat to our democracy

The United States faces “a more dangerous period” from domestic extremists today than it did when the Oklahoma City bombing occurred in 1995.

That was Judge Merrick B. Garland’s assessment when he testified today at the hearing   on his nomination for Attorney General.

What should we do in Maryland in response to this threat?

Senator Shelly Hettleman and I have introduced legislation to create a task force to study and make recommendations regarding policies and procedures for preventing and countering domestic terrorism.

Can we have advance knowledge of illegal and deadly acts without stepping on legitimate protest?

Are ideologically motivated hate crimes and domestic terrorism overlapping phenomena that need to be addressed in that context?

Those are some of the questions that we need to deal with as we confront this threat to our democracy.

Addressing Domestic Terrorism

Last year, I introduced a bill to criminalize domestic terrorism.

House Bill 1164 would make it a separate offense to commit a crime with the intent to cause serious physical injury or death to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion.

There would be an enhanced penalty for these acts, like a hate crime.

The bill did not pass.

However, I worked with the committee chairman, Delegate Luke Clippinger, on a letter to the Director of the Governor’s Office of Homeland Security.

The letter asks for a “report on the State’s efforts and plans to prevent, detect, and address domestic terrorism, to the extent that the publication of such information does not jeopardize public safety or security.”

The letter was sent on May 11.  There has been no response.

Last week, as you know, the F.B.I. and state authorities arrested 13 men in connection with a domestic terrorism plot to kidnap the governor of Michigan.

I already planned to reintroduce my bill.

A letter and a list

Sometimes a letter will do.

If a committee is not ready to pass my legislation, I can ask the chair to send a letter to the affected state agency to review the issue raised by my bill and report back to the committee before next year’s session.

That reply can help build the case for next year’s bill.

For example, House Bill 1164 would create the crime of domestic terrorism It would also require the Governor’s Office of Homeland Security to report to the General Assembly on the state’s efforts to plan, prevent, detect, and address domestic terrorism.

A letter could get the report done.

—-

I’m already listing my tasks for after the session ends.

At a discussion this morning of the Kirwan education reform bill, I made notes to:

  1. Review the effect of Kirwan’s salary increases for teachers on programs I’ve sponsored that help teachers repay their academic debt; and
  2. Discuss with education experts next steps I should take to help implement what we are about to enact in the schools in my district.

The biggest waste of time in Annapolis

A lot of legislators spend a lot of time asking their colleagues to co-sponsor their bills.

It’s the biggest waste of time in Annapolis.

Except when it isn’t.

Lots of co-sponsors won’t influence the committee that’s considering your legislation.

A handful of prominent members of the committee might help – especially those who will be in the room where it happens when the committee leadership discusses bills prior to the full committee’s voting session.

Co-sponsors can also make a statement if you’re introducing a bill to create the crime of domestic terrorism.

My bill would create a new criminal offense for the commission of any violent crime with the intent to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or influence the policy or conduct of a government by intimidation, coercion, mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping.

It would also require the Governor’s Office of Homeland Security to report to the General Assembly on the State’s efforts and plans to prevent, detect, and address domestic terrorism.

The three people I’ve asked to co-sponsor the bill are the chairs of the Legislative Black Caucus, the Legislative Latino Caucus, and the Women’s Legislative Caucus.

Their support would make a statement.

From despair to prevention

My first reaction to Saturday’s slaughter in El Paso and Dayton was despair. Nothing to prevent future killings will come of this.

In the 48 hours since then, my outlook has changed.

President Trump has reduced funding for the Department of Homeland Security to assess the threat from homegrown violent extremists and domestic terrorists.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/homeland-security-disbands-domestic-terror-intelligence-unit

The Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act (S. 894/H.R.1931) would require federal law enforcement agencies to regularly evaluate these risks and provide training and resources to assist state, local, and tribal law enforcement.

If we don’t see positive action on the federal level, legislation should require the State Police to assume this responsibility.

I was already working on a response to the President’s racist tweets about Congressman Elijah Cummings and Baltimore City. And I have company.

“This has roused Baltimore like nothing I’ve seen in the past five years,” JHU Professor Matthew Crenson has said. “There’s a community spirit that perhaps the mayor could harness, using Baltimore itself to make appeals to the state and federal government.”

http://www.baltimoresun.com/maryland/baltimore-city/bs-md-ci-baltimore-good-and-bad-20190801-iwc3zsfmynb23mejxbetx2plri-story.html

I’m working with my legislative colleagues to assemble a list of redevelopment projects in the 7th Congressional District that are eligible for federal or state funding.

  • My Key Issues:

  • Pimlico and The Preakness
  • Our Neighborhoods
  • Pre-Kindergarten
  • Lead Paint Poisoning