Beginning the discussion on taxes

        We got to the heart of the matter today – taxes.

        Education, elections, gambling, and transportation are in our jurisdiction on the Ways and Means Committee.  But taxes are the most important and politically difficult decisions we make. 

         Briefings like today’s are informative; bill hearings are decisive. 

         Nonetheless, we began the discussion about revenues, with the participation of Speaker Busch. 

         For some advocates, it’s a question of how much money their proposal will raise.  As policymakers, our question is how much revenue do we need to educate our children, enhance our economy, and, in the words of Hubert Humphrey, care for those in the twilight of life, the elderly, and in the shadows of life, the sick, the needy, and the handicapped.

      —- 

           My diary next week will be from Florida.  I’m off to visit my mother and steal some strikes behind the plate at a baseball fantasy camp. 

           An audio slideshow from my trip to Israel is now at delsandy.com, thanks to my niece, Rachel.   (Go to Featured Video)

January 27

Opportunities in the classroom and the voting booth

            Show me the program!

            I was watching the State of the Union speech last night, not a rerun of “Jerry Maguire.”

            When President Obama spoke about the educational reforms resulting from the Race to the Top competition and a once failing school in Denver where 97% of the seniors had graduated this past May, I was elated.  “This is what I’m working on in Annapolis!” I said to myself.

                 “If you want to make a difference in the life of a child — become a teacher,” the President declared.  “Your country needs you.”

                  And then he moved on to another topic. 

                 “Show me the program!” I said to myself.  At that moment, the President should have proposed incentives for people to become teachers. 

—- 

            The topic this afternoon was of great interest to all of the members of my committee: the date for the primary election when we seek reelection. 

            Federal law now requires that absentee ballots be received by members of the military and overseas voters 45 days before a federal election. 

            This means we can no longer hold our gubernatorial primary in September.  Rather than hold it in the late summer before Labor Day, while many people are on vacation, a change to June or July is likely. 

            If I’ve done my job well, it doesn’t matter when the election takes place. 

            As an election administrator testified, “We’re always looking at ways to make things better for the voters.”

January 26

The elephant in the economy

               There’s an elephant in the room, but the Republican Party won’t acknowledge it.

                One would think an op-ed on the state budget would mention the impact of the Great Recession. 

                 Not the one in today’s Sun written by Larry Hogan, a Cabinet secretary in the Ehrlich administration.  Our deficit is all the fault of Martin O’Malley, he writes.

                 My committee had a briefing on the budget from our non-partisan fiscal staff this afternoon.

                 I asked about the impact of the national economy on state revenues.  They’ve been flat for the last three fiscal years.  In addition, safety net costs have risen – unemployment, welfare, and Medicaid.

                  The $680 million per year in additional revenue from the taxes we raised and slots we authorized at the special session in 2007 would have eliminated our structural deficit, according to our staff’s projections at the time. 

                  You can argue (and I don’t agree) that spending should be cut significantly or that high end taxpayers should not pay more, but at least acknowledge that we’re in the mess we’re in because the bubble burst on the national economy.

Doing what the Romans do

              I can’t recall the last time an action by the government of Italy affected one of my bills.

              The regulations for state executions, now under review by the legislature, require that sodium thiopental be used.  The lone American manufacturer of this drug has stopped manufacturing it, according to Saturday’s New York Times

            The company has an Italian plant, but the authorities there will not permit shipment of the drug if it is to be used to carry out a death penalty.

             After reading about this, I did what I often do.  I asked the Attorney General’s Office to do some research:  “Does the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services have this drug on hand and, if so, what is the expiration date for the drug?” 

             I wasn’t the only person making such an inquiry.  Late this afternoon, John Wagner of the Washington Post wrote that “any supply still on hand in Maryland — which last executed a prisoner in 2005 — has since expired, according to a corrections department spokesperson.”

            However this issue is resolved, I said to myself when I finished the Times story, it demonstrates yet again that the days of the death penalty are numbered.

Spreading the good news

               It’s good to be the person who spreads good news. 

               At a budget briefing, I sat next to a staffer who made very few such calls this week.  He did share some good news with me before the Governor told the rest of the group.  There’s $12.4 million in the budget for stem cell research, a $2 million increase.

                I later told the advocates who were our likely supporters on the budget subcommittees that will vote on this funding.   

               Now that I’m on the Ways and Means Committee, my focus won’t be the budget but the Budget Reconciliation and Financing Act, fondly known as the BRFA.

               It contains the changes in funding formulas for state aid to Baltimore City and the 23 counties, as well as subsidies  for the horseracing industry. 

 January 21, 2011

Touching all of the bases

              I thought I had touched all of the bases on one of my bill drafts. 

              My constituents, who had come to me with a problem that the legislation would resolve, were satisfied.  I’ve spoken with the lobbyists for both of the relevant industry associations and sent the proposal to them yesterday.  

               But I realized this morning that I had forgotten to do the same with the state agency that regulates my constituents’ business.  So I promptly (and nervously) emailed the bill to the agency’s lobbyist.

               His response:  “The language looks solid from our perspective.” 

               Another detail dealt with, followed by a sigh of relief.

January 20

Sargent Shriver: His teaching lives on

            Today’s Peace Corps is Teach For America.

            I’m prompted to write about the Peace Corps because of the passing of Sargent Shriver.  Under his leadership, idealistic Americans went to foreign countries to teach in classrooms and everywhere else in the communities where they lived.

            For the last 20 years, idealistic recent college grads have taught in the classrooms of underperforming schools in both urban and rural America.  There are currently 320 in Baltimore City. 

            One TFA alumnus took my Legislation class at the University of Maryland Law School two years ago.  This past summer, Bill Ferguson was elected to the State Senate from South Baltimore. 

            Bill and I decided that his policy knowledge and my political skills could produce some important education reforms.  We asked a group of advocates to offer their ideas.   Despite their years of advocacy, it was the first time they sat around the same table to strategize. 

            We’ve begun to show our bill drafts to the key players on K-12 education in Annapolis.  Better to address their concerns and gain their support now than to offer a host of amendments after our legislation is introduced. 

            I’m sure that Sargent Shriver saw Teach For America as a worthy offspring of the Peace Corps and the War on Poverty, which he also headed. 

            I’d like to think that he’d also find favor with what we’re trying to do on education.

 January 19

A smaller tent – gay rights and the GOP

            The big tent just got a lot smaller. 

            Ronald Reagan spoke of the Republican Party’s big tent, which allowed for members of differing views.  More recently, that tent has been contrasted with political correctness on the left.

             Last week, the Republican leader in the State Senate, Alan Kittleman, announced that he would be introducing a bill to allow civil unions for same-sex couples.

             Today, the senator announced that he would be resigning his position.  The Republican caucus would “feel more comfortable” with a different leader, he said on the Senate floor.

            Truth be told, the GOP tent was never big.  On abortion and gay rights, the Democratic Party has greater diversity. 

            Every Republican member of the House of Representatives, but one, voted for the pro-life Stupak amendment to President Obama’s health care bill.  Among the Democrats, 64 voted yes and 194 voted no. 

            Two years ago, I had a bill outlining the procedure for moving human remains from a burial site.  The domestic partner of the decedent was one of the individuals who could authorize the disinterment.

            The only Senate  Republican to vote for it was Alan Kittleman.

Not reinventing or recycling

            If you don’t need to reinvent the wheel, don’t. 

            I brought the draft legislation to our power breakfast.  It would encourage the hiring of low-income individuals for certain construction projects.

            Every word in the bill was new because it would add a section to the law.

            And then the light went on.  (Perhaps it was the cholesterol intake.)

            I remembered that I had passed a law encouraging people doing business with the state to hire current and former welfare recipients.  With a little help from a friend, I found the language. 

            Now I’ll compare the existing law and how it’s been implemented to what we’re trying to accomplish

            I may be one of the most liberal members of the General Assembly, but when it comes to bill drafting, I’m very conservative. 

            If I can say that my proposal modifies existing law and builds on what is already state policy, that’s a big plus.

            One could also see this episode as evidence that after 28 years, I’m recycling the same ideas.  But let’s not go there.

January 17

Some do, some don’t

               Some people plan ahead. Some people don’t.

               I spoke with one person today who suggested that I should meet with other interested legislators and advocates to draft legislation on one of the issues before the Ways and Means Committee.

               At another meeting on a different issue, I asked if such a group was in the works. The answer: no.

                Some issues are of such importance that the legislature will try to find a solution, regardless of the foresight of the affected parties. It’s preferable, however, to start early.

January 14

  • My Key Issues:

  • Pimlico and The Preakness
  • Our Neighborhoods
  • Pre-Kindergarten
  • Lead Paint Poisoning