The road to a unanimous vote

          137-0!!

          That was the message I sent to Aaron Greenfield, the lead lobbyist for the survivors and the descendants of those who perished in the Nazi concentration camps after being transported there by the French national railroad.

         That was the vote this afternoon as the House passed the amended version of my bill requiring the company to make its records of those transports Internet accessible.

          A lot of work preceded that unanimous vote.

          Extraordinarily moving hearings prompted the Senate committee to give the bill a unanimous favorable report right after the testimony concluded.  That is a very rare occurrence.

          Shortly thereafter, the railroad company changed its position on when it could make these records available. What had been impossible to do became something that could be done in four-to-six months.

          Our negotiations over the amendments to accomplish that lasted two weeks. They would have not succeeded without the exceptional efforts of Delegate Pete Hammen, chairman of the committee to which my bill had been referred, and Ed Papenfuse, the state archivist.

           There were times when I had to remind myself not to be too anxious to seek a compromise but to let the discussions follow their natural course.

           After the bill passed, I called the press and Bill Pitcher, the lobbyist for the railroad company.

           I said to him, “The end product is something we can be proud of.”

March 28

The view from the top of the stretch

           I first watched the races at Pimlico from Jay Slater’s roof on Rogers Avenue.

          Jay was in my elementary school class, and he lived at the top of the stretch.

          When we crossed the street to make our first bets, I didn’t shave that day so that I could pass for 18. 

          Now I serve on the committee which has jurisdiction over the Governor’s bill to provide an operating budget subsidy to the racing industry for three years. 

         That means I saw his staff’s proposed amendments to the legislation. 

         I made two suggestions, and both were accepted.

         1. Require the industry to develop a long-term plan to revive racing; and

         2.   Have that plan and other required reports submitted in December, instead of February, so that the legislature will have time to evaluate them while we’re in session. 

          The bill would also create an Oversight Commission on Racing.  Three of its members would be delegates, appointed by the Speaker. 

          I hope there’s room for a delegate who represents the Pimlico area and knows how to read the Daily Racing Form cleanshaven.

March 26

The journey to the Senate

         “I love to be over here.”

          That’s how one of my House colleagues began his testimony before a Senate committee.

          My sentiments exactly. You’re testifying in the Senate only if your bill has passed the House.

          My legislation would prohibit the use of force, threat or intimidation by those gathering signatures to petition onto the ballot a recently enacted law or a zoning decision. It would apply the same standards to those opposing the referendum effort.

          Afterwards, I emailed someone who knows the Senate committee well to get his assessment of how my bill was received.

           While I was at the hearing, my last bill that’s likely to make it to the Senate this session began its journey there.

           My legislation to allow law students to receive grants for lower-paying summer jobs in State’s Attorneys offices and non-profit legal groups received a favorable report from the education subcommittee of the Ways and Means Committee.

March 24

Nearing 3rd base and in the infield

          When you’re nearing third base, assume the coach will wave you home.  If you slow down, the catcher may be waiting to tag you out. 

          BJ Surhoff taught us that at a Ripken Fantasy Camp. 

          In Annapolis (and elsewhere), that means plan ahead and be prepared.

          We must have a special session this fall to redraw the lines for the state’s eight Congressional districts.  We could consider other issues at that time – if the Governor and the presiding officers agree to do so. 

           Today was not the first time that a lobbyist asked me whether an issue of interest to him would be on the agenda this fall.  Better to be running at full speed than to be caught unawares.

           The budget bill was debated by the House this afternoon.  Earlier in the day, I was asked to be ready to speak on abortion, stem cell research, and horse racing. 

            “It’s a matter of conscience – for those of us in this body, for the voters who approved abortion when it was on referendum in 1992, and for the women on Medicaid who would be affected if the state no longer paid part of the cost if they choose to have one,” I declared. 

            The floor was as quiet as it has ever been during the many times I have spoken over the last 29 years.  The amendment to eliminate state funding for abortions failed, 52-82. 

             Other members effectively made the argument to preserve state funding of research with both adult and embryonic stem cells.  The amendment to eliminate this program failed, 44-90.

            “If we cut funding for purses and the operating expenses of the race tracks, you won’t have 100,000 people in the infield at Pimlico on the third Saturday in May. The Preakness will be run in another state,” I said.  This amendment failed, 11-121. 

March 23

A silent dog and an easy allegation

        The dog that didn’t bark persuaded Sherlock Holmes that the intruder was known to the victim and his guardian animal. 

        The gun didn’t fire on the House floor today.  There were two bills dealing with guns, but neither drew any comments or amendments.  

          I’m not Holmes.  So I don’t know why.

           There has a great deal of discussion on my bill to prevent dirty tricks before they affect an election by allowing a judge to issue an injunction when there is clear and convincing evidence that someone has violated the law or may do so imminently.  

           I had not participated in the debate, leaving that responsibility to the chair of the subcommittee that worked on my legislation. 

          However, when the minority leader erroneously said that my bill would permit someone to make an “easy allegation” that could affect the outcome of an election, I finally rose to speak. 

           “This legislation is modeled on a provision in the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965.  An ‘easy allegation’ won’t persuade a judge to issue a court order,” I said. 

            The bill passed, 96-44.

March 22

A grocery store, favorable amendments, and not a planned trip

           You need to sweat the details – at home and in Annapolis.

           That’s what I told the people at a community meeting in Howard Park this weekend. 

            The subject was the long awaited and much anticipated grocery store at Hillsdale and Liberty Heights Avenues.  The community is very interested in employment opportunities there, as well as the positive effect it could have on redevelopment of the nearby Ambassador Theatre, where Barry Levinson first went to the movies. 

             “We will sweat the details on these issues for you,” I said, on behalf of myself, my 41st District colleagues, and the two City Councilwomen who represent the area. 

             In Annapolis, favorable amendments were added to the Senate version of one of my bills.  I described the changes in a memo that I will be hand delivering and discussing with each of the members of the Education subcommittee on my committee. 

              Sweating the details and taking nothing for granted.

              I’ve been in several meetings to iron out amendments to my bill requiring the French railroad to make available on the Internet its records from the deportation of Jews to the Nazi concentration camps. 

             The bill defines property as “any personal belongings owned or controlled by victims.”

              “Why what does ‘controlled’ mean?  Isn’t ‘owned’ sufficient?” someone asked.

              “People brought whatever they could put in one piece of luggage or just a knapsack,” I responded.  “This wasn’t a planned trip.”

March 21

I often depend upon help from colleagues

           This was a day for the newsletter rule.

            I don’t have to be the lead sponsor of a bill. If I can legitimately take credit for my role in getting a bill passed, then I can mention it in my end-of-session newsletter.

           Two examples today.

           Last year, I introduced legislation to require the Public Service Commission to make comparative information about electricity prices easily accessible to the public. This website would include a user-friendly search tool, enabling consumers to search for service offers in their zip codes.

             My bill did not pass, but the chairman of the committee introduced similar legislation this session. House Bill 597 would require the commission to regularly update a customer choice education page. It passed the House today, 138-0.

             After the shooting of Congressman Gabrielle Giffords in January, I did not want that tragedy to pass without the legislature taking action. 

             At a minimum, we should address access to guns by people with mental illness. Gun control legislation is considered by the Judiciary Committee, where I served until this year.

             This means I would no longer be the most effective person to shepherd the bill through the committee.  So I asked Delegate Lu Simmons, a subcommittee chairman on Judiciary, to be the lead sponsor.

             He did the research and drafting for the legislation but kept me informed along the way. The amended bill, which creates a task force to study the access of individuals with mental illness to regulated firearms, was reported to the House floor today.

March 18

Planning for next year

          Some of my bills get killed.

          What do I do next?

           Plan for next year.

            I just learned that one bill died in subcommittee yesterday despite the fact that we proposed amendments to meet the objections raised by our opponents at the bill hearing.

           I promptly wrote the people I worked with on the legislation:

          My suggestion for next year: Have the bill drafted this summer with these amendments. Ask the Attorney General if the revised version meets the objections of the bill’s opponents. Share that response with the organizations and lobbyists who opposed the bill prior to the bill hearing. Then provide the committee with their responses – or lack thereof.

            Another school of thought says you should outorganize the other side between now and next session. Flood members with emails and phone calls.

            Granted, you need to demonstrate that voters care about your bill. But you can’t do it by numbers alone. Most of the time, you also have to modify your bill to meet the legitimate objections to it or to pick up the needed votes.

            And remember, most bills don’t pass the first year they’re introduced.

March 17

A moment I’ll never forget

          I’ve never received a message like this before:

          We are told that they [the KIPP school and the Baltimore Teachers Union] are close to an agreement. Any chance we can move our bill down the list [of bills to be heard in my committee today] to allow for more time?

          The email this noon was from one of the pro bono lobbyists for KIPP, a charter school in my district whose students have excelled.

           Last year, KIPP’s middle school students out-performed the state average on the Maryland State Assessment in reading and math. KIPP sends its 8th graders to the city’s best public and private high schools, helping many of them secure scholarships.

          86% of KIPP’s first graduating class finished high school in four years, and everyone of those students earned admission to college.

          Central to KIPP students’ success are their teachers. Their commitment to these children extends beyond regular class hours. KIPP cannot afford to pay them the overtime rates mandated in the contract for teachers in Baltimore City.

          My bill would allow a charter school such as KIPP to conduct a secret ballot election among its employees to vote on an amendment to a collective bargaining agreement. An 80% super majority would be needed to adopt the amendment.

           This democratic process respects both the collective bargaining agreement and KIPP’s commitment to its students.

           The introduction of my legislation had its desired effect. It prompted KIPP administrators and officials of the Baltimore Teachers Union to discuss a long-term solution to this matter.

           This afternoon, they initialed the outlines of an understanding.

            To give the news about this agreement to the 100 parents of KIPP students gathered in Annapolis to testify for the bill and share their joy is a moment that I have never experienced before and will never forget.

March 16

Ending Executions

           I was asked only one question. 

           I had started my testimony on repeal of the death penalty by saying, “I’ve told this committee in prior years that the death penalty is inherently flawed.  You can’t always get it right.  There’s always the risk that innocent people will be executed.

            “Last week Governor Quinn  of Illinois said that as well, when he signed the law repealing capital punishment in that state.” 

              My tone was deliberate but emotional. 

             After I finished, the chairman asked if there were any questions. 

             “Why should we get rid of something when we never use it?” asked a delegate.

              “More than one warrant for execution will be on the Governor’s desk before his term ends,” I replied.  “The decision to end capital punishment in Maryland should not be made by one person but by the people’s representatives in the legislature.”

 March 15

  • My Key Issues:

  • Pimlico and The Preakness
  • Our Neighborhoods
  • Pre-Kindergarten
  • Lead Paint Poisoning