Our accomplishment is a lot

“We are not here long, but our accomplishment is a lot,” declared a speaker before the dinner.

I have gone to countless community meetings, religious services, and synagogue banquets over the last 30+ years.

Last night, for the first time, I went to the annual dinner of the Ohr Hamizrach Congregation, the religious home of approximately 200 Jewish families who fled Iran after the fall of the Shah.

“My family got a phone call telling us the police would soon be at our home,” recalled one congregant during the cocktail hour.  “We took jeeps to the mountains, then camels, and fled to Pakistan.  Then to London and Baltimore.”

I drove past City College this morning.

The tower was impressive amidst the fog.

So is the teaching that takes place inside that building, I said to myself, as it has for immigrants, their offspring, and African-Americans who were equals in an integrated setting there for the first time in their lives.

Sandy and Sunday

My work on House Bill 217 began the day before Sandy blew into town.

I wanted to thank early voters at the former Pimlico Junior High.  I had to park three blocks away.  The line inside snaked around both sides of the entire first floor.   The expected wait was more than three hours.

Perhaps some were there because Hurricane Sandy was on its way.  Many more were there because “They tried to keep you from voting,” as I said to several voters.

I was referring to the Republican efforts to suppress voter turnout last fall.  Since no electioneering is allowed inside a polling place, I did not use the “R” word.

When I got home, I emailed a bill drafting request.  Early voting should be extended to the Sunday before Election Day, and the number of early voting centers should be doubled for the general election.

That request became House Bill 217, which had its public hearing today.

The key obstacle to Sunday voting is whether the names of early voters can be downloaded in time to the polling books used in each precinct on Election Day.

The State Board of Elections says no.  One committee member with a software background was skeptical.  I’ve asked a private-sector computer expert to assess the Board’s written statement.

An increase in the number of early voting centers seems likely.  It could be my formula or another.

One of the witnesses for the bill was Rev. Todd Yeary, senior pastor at Douglas Memorial Community Church in Baltimore.

“I feel rewarded because I got an ‘Amen’ from a committee member,” intoned Rev. Yeary.

I’ll feel rewarded if the bill gets a favorable report.

Gideon’s Trumpet

     The crowds were across the street.

And down the block.

Five thousand people signed up to testify on the gun measures today in the Senate, a Republican colleague told me.

No doubt there were many references to the 2nd Amendment.

My committee’s hearing on these bills will attract similar intensity.

Today, however, we discussed how a poor individual can protect the civil rights secured by the Maryland Constitution or Declaration of Rights.

Those protections are similar to those in the federal Constitution and Bill of Rights, but there is no Maryland provision addressing the right to bear arms.

The objective of the legislation before us was best described by Steve Sachs, former Attorney General of Maryland:  “My core belief is that the glorious phrase ‘equal justice under law’ is only an empty phrase unless all citizens can access the rule of law.”

The less eloquent but key phrase at today’s hearing was “attorney’s fees.”

Since the prevailing party would be awarded those fees, the bill was opposed by local governments and the business community.

My view of this legislation was determined nearly 40 years ago when I read Gideon’s Trumpet, a book about the Supreme Court case that established the right to counsel in criminal cases.

A few years ago, the author, Anthony Lewis, autographed my copy: “for Sandy Rosenberg, who writes laws.”

In this instance, I will try to write a law that increases the constitutional protections afforded all Marylanders, regardless of their ability to hire a lawyer.

Several people have asked me when I’m leaving for Fantasy Camp.

Good to learn how much I was missed last week.

 

February 5 – The wrong interpretation

The hearing on my bill to create a task force to study phased retirement for state employees was going very well.

The group would study how employees could work part time and tutor their successors at the same time.

Representatives of management (the Department of Budget and Management) and labor (AFSCME) sat next to me at the witness table.  Both were supporting the bill.

We testified that we had already shown the relevant subcommittee chair language that would accomplish our goal with committee narrative attached to the budget bill.  My bill would not pass but we would still achieve my objective.

“But then Delegate Rosenberg would not get credit,” stated one member of the committee, “unless we called it the Rosenberg Retirement Task Force.”

“That could be interpreted the wrong way by some people,” I responded.

—-

I didn’t go to the Ravens parade.

I’m waiting for next October.

 

Sorest loser and declaring victory

“The sorest loser that ever lived.”

That’s what Earl Weaver wanted inscribed on his gravestone.

And that’s how he managed when the pros played the Fantasy Campers, some of his former players recalled last week.

Earl aside, Jim Palmer would throw batting practice fast balls.  However, you did not want to come to the plate after another camper had gotten a base hit.

To win, a manager has to keep his 25 players happy.  Only ten people start each game.

Every camper is in the starting lineup, but if you’re hitting twelfth and last, as I did, that’s only two at bats each six-inning game.

I did, however, come up twice against 20-game winner Mike Boddicker.  The second time, I stroked a run-scoring two-out “legitimate” single to left (Boddicker’s term).

With a career average of .500, I now “own” him, as they say in the dugout.

Back in Annapolis, I now need to keep the bills in my lineup happy.

I’ve introduced thirteen, with an additional dozen or more to be put in the hopper by the Thursday 5 p.m. deadline.

Four bills will be heard this week.  That means revising draft testimony and ensuring that a broad group of witnesses will testify, hopefully with a story to tell about why we need to pass this bill.

And if a task force to study the issue is the best that you can accomplish, as may be the case for two of my bills already, you don’t need to be a sore loser.

Declare victory instead.

Race to the Tots

Bill Ferguson was 27 when he was elected to the State Senate in 2010.  (I was 32 in 1982.)

Before that, he taught in the Baltimore City public schools as a member of Teach For America and graduated from the University of Maryland School of Law, where he took the Legislation class that I co-teach.

Shortly after his election, we decided to work together on education issues.

Bill would bring his knowledge of the classroom; I my knowledge of the legislative process.  Or as one educator commented, “Sandy will be the muscle.”

Last year, we enacted a loan forgiveness program for teachers who have excelled in the classroom.

Pre-schoolers are the focus of our attention this session.

President Obama encouraged education reform with his Race to the Top program.

Senator Ferguson and I hope to provide a better pre-kindergarten education for high-need children so that they can enter elementary school ready to learn.  Our program is called Race to the Tots.

Local school systems would submit their proposals in a competitive evaluation process.

Our proposal got a very favorable reception from two dozen education advocates at a lunch meeting.

Their one criticism: it doesn’t go far enough.

Our bill draft would fund the program at $10 million for each of the next three years.

More money and more years, they said.

I hope the bill hearing in Annapolis goes that well.

If your Task Force recommendation can make it there, it can make it anywhere…

The New York Times reports:

Governor Cuomo’s “aides worked with several advocacy groups, including the Brady Campaign in Washington, New Yorkers Against Gun Violence and the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence in San Francisco, to develop a package of measures that would be comprehensive but also politically achievable. They looked to other states; a provision in the new law to require mental health professionals to report possibly violent patients was similar to a recommendation by a task force created last year by Gov. Martin O’Malley and state legislators [Delegate Lu Simmons and I were the sponsors] in Maryland.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/24/nyregion/cuomo-used-all-his-means-to-pass-gun-control-package.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

That is a first.  My legislation leads to a law being enacted in another state before we do so in Maryland.

As we draft our bill, Delegate Simmons and I will include all of the recommendations of the Task Force so that they can receive a full hearing by the legislature.

    We will also introduce legislation outlining the preventive programs the State should fund so that people don’t reach the stage where they pose a threat to others.

 

Translating into bill language

     All verbal or physical actions threatening suicide or serious violence toward a reasonably identifiable victim or victims should be reported to local law enforcement. Mandated reporting should apply to psychiatrists, psychologists, physicians, social workers, addiction treatment counselors, educators, case managers, and probation agents.

That is a recommendation of the Task Force to Study Access of Mentally Ill Individuals To Regulated Firearms.

Delegate Simmons and I will try to translate those words into bill language.  Along the way, we will also have to make some decisions.

If we include suicide, will people be less likely to tell one of those professionals of their concerns?

Which educators should be covered by the law?  Teachers, supervisors, office staff?

Our decisions will not be the last word.  They will be reviewed by the House committee to which our bill is referred

That’s what I told the members of the Task Force at its meeting this afternoon.

Some of them wanted us to delay introducing a bill until the group reached a consensus.

“With all of the attention focused on gun violence this session, now is an opportune time to begin consideration of these issues by the General Assembly,” I stated.  “My colleagues may decide that, like you, they need more time to do this right.”

 

What I didn’t work on yesterday

          Today was a day to work on the legislation that I didn’t work on yesterday.

I emailed the drafts of several bills to supporters and asked for their comments.

Their suggestions could improve the bill.  Better to incorporate them into the bill before it’s introduced than to present a long list of amendments at the bill hearing.

The latter is a sign that your bill needs lots of work, which can be fatal.

I also learned of my first bill hearings of the session.

My early voting legislation will be heard on February 7.  My staff and I need to discuss potential witnesses and what data will bolster my argument that Sunday voting will increase turnout, without interfering with the preparations for Election Day two days later.

This summer, I read that the federal government offers phased retirement for its workers. On February 5, there will be a hearing on my bill to create a task force to study doing the same in Maryland.  We need to find state government employees to testify on how they and their successors would benefit.

Meeting a deadline and the votes for passage

     I’m old enough to remember when the clock was literally turned back at midnight to provide additional time for the General Assembly to conclude its business on the last day of the session.

      To avoid that time travel, we are now guaranteed a bill hearing if we submit our bill requests to our drafting staff by the close of business today.  The overwhelming majority of House bills will be introduced by the next deadline on February 7, and all of that legislation will have a public hearing by the second week in March.

No matter how well I think I’ve planned ahead, there’s a rush of requests today – seven to be exact.

I realized that I’m old enough not to remember the email address for the bill drafting office.  I had to settle for CtrlC(copy).

In some cases, some of the details of your proposed legislation may be lacking.  So you request that last year’s bill be reintroduced with the intent of making changes to gain support before the bill is introduced.

An advocacy group may be unaware of the deadline.  So at a meeting yesterday, you offer to make a bill request, giving the group the time to find another sponsor who’s on the committee that will hear the bill.

—-

My name will be on one bill that was introduced today.

I am one of 66 co-sponsors of the Governor’s legislation to repeal the death penalty.  As I sought support on the House floor, additional members also indicated they would vote yes but not co-sponsor.

We have the votes for passage.

  • My Key Issues:

  • Pimlico and The Preakness
  • Our Neighborhoods
  • Pre-Kindergarten
  • Lead Paint Poisoning